Search
Close this search box.

Prototype – Natural ventilation chimney

Project for a building ventilated by natural ventilation stacks

EOLIOS Ingénierie was contacted by an architectural firm to study the natural ventilation of a future building.
The office premises were to be ventilated using wind chimneys.
In this type of natural ventilation, it’s not the effect of thermal draught that takes precedence, but the action of the wind.

In this study, EOLIOS studied several types of chimney and determined which offered the best airflow.

Project

Prototype - Natural ventilation chimney

Year

2024

Customer

Location

Rennes

Typology

HVAC engineering

Continue navigation :

Our other projects :

Latest news :

Technical file :

Our expertise:

Technical file :

Numerical simulation of natural ventilation using a wind stack

Project overview

Eolios has carried out an in-depth study of a future architectural project that integrates two main components: a section dedicated to housing and another to business premises. Our focus is specifically on the latter, as it is the business premises that will benefit from a natural ventilation system.

Climate study

To carry out this natural ventilation study, we first carry out a climatic analysis of the future site, in order to make the simulations as realistic as possible.
For this project, the climatic analysis revealed that the wind blows mainly from the south-west.
A second dominant wind comes from the north-east.
Having identified these dominant winds, we measure their intensity, i.e. the average wind speed in these directions, as well as minimum and maximum speeds to study extreme cases.

Wind profile used

A seasonal temperature study has also been carried out, but is not presented in this section.
In the remainder of this article, we will present results for a south-westerly wind speed of 6 m/s, which, according to this climatic study, is the most frequent wind.

3D model

When studying the natural ventilation of a building, it’s crucial to take into account neighboring buildings that act as aeraulic masks.
These surrounding structures can have a significant impact on the flow of air aroundand through the building under study. The presence of neighboring buildings can create zones of varying pressure and turbulence that influence wind direction and speed.
Consequently, accurate modeling of these neighboring buildings is essential for a realistic assessment of natural ventilation.

3D model of the building studied

By modeling neighboring buildings, we can simulate the effects of obstacles on air currents.
This includes determining wind shadow zones, where air flow is reduced or disturbed, and wind channels, where flow is accelerated.
These phenomena can affect the indoor air quality, thermal comfort and energy efficiency of the building under study.
Good modeling helps identify the best positions for ventilation openings, such as windows and vents, to optimize the supply of fresh air and the removal of stale air.

Sizing

Correct sizing of ventilation ducts is essential for efficient ventilation. Eolios offers its expertise in sizing and improving natural ventilation systems.
CFD simulation is then used to verify this sizing. The advantage of CFD lies in the possibility of testing several systems and configurations.
Indeed, it is easier to modify ventilation systems during the simulation phase than when they are already installed.

Try out several CFD chimneys

Studies have been carried out on several chimneys:

  • One with a rectangular conduit 4m high and a flat hood
  • Two with a 4m-high cylindrical duct: one with a fixed half-spherical hood and the other with a rotating hood.
  • And a 4m high façade with 2 orientations

The aim of the study is to determine the most appropriate shape for the project by comparing the flow rates extracted by the chimneys in the different configurations.
Capture surfaces and flue sizes are equivalent for each study, in order to compare natural draft efficiency only.

Air velocities for 4 different chimney configurations
Four chimney configurations - Comparison

Studies show that the chimney with the rotating hood creates the most draught.
Output is around twice that of fixed hood chimneys, irrespective of wind source or disturbance from surrounding buildings.
What’s more, the hood rotates to provide optimum conditions for the best draft.

Façade-mounted chimneys can be an interesting solution, despite some constraints. Depending on the wind direction and the orientation of the chimney, it can operate either as an air intake or an air outlet, which can be both an advantage and a drawback.

For the purposes of this study, in order to obtain the best possible draught, a chimney with a rotating hood is the preferred choice.

Simulations and results

This section presents the results of CFD simulations with individual ducts and movable cylindrical chimneys.
Indeed, as initial simulations show, this type of chimney is the most efficient.

The simulation results presented below are for a south-westerly wind of around 6 m/s.
This is the prevailing wind in the project area.
It should be noted that other wind directions and speeds are tested, but are not presented in this article.

The red areas indicate which stacks are most affected by the south-westerly wind.
Stacks that do not have these red spots are less affected by the wind, due to the presence of other stacks upstream.

Again with the aim of comparing fixed and mobile chimneys, two studies have been carried out for each case, and are presented below.

Wall pressure - Chimneys
Velocity distribution in individual flues of mobile chimneys

At first glance, the velocities in the flues of mobile chimneys are higher than in the flues of fixed chimneys.
There is also a difference between the flues of fixed chimneys.
In the case of fixed chimneys, the chimney with the longest flue (1st floor) has a flow rate of 0.7 Vol/h, well below the 5 Vol/h expected. Only the shortest flue (5th floor) comes close to meeting the 5 Vol/h target, and this flow rate increases as you move upstairs.

The table below summarizes flow rates by floor and by chimney type:

Comparison of flow rates for different stacks

This table shows that ventilation by fixed chimney works on average 2 times less well than ventilation by mobile chimney.
It is also important to note that, with a fixed chimney, the second floor is virtually unventilated.

In this study, the facade openings studied are in the upper position and open once every two frames, as shown in the figure below.

Horizontal speed plan in the building on the 3rd floor

It can be seen that the series of stacks directly exposed to the wind (circled in red on the figure above) have flow rates well above the average for other stacks.
For these stacks, the 5 Vol/h target is therefore achieved in the mobile case, but not in the fixed case.

We can see from these initial results that natural ventilation functions correctly in the case of the chimney with the movable hood.
In this case, the ducts have been correctly sized to achieve a ventilation rate of 5 Vol/h.

Video summary of the study

Play Video
Video summary of the study

Discover other projects

Comfort – Rooftop of a palace – Casablanca

Prototype – Natural ventilation chimney

Tour Liberté – La Défense

Impact of wind on a solar power plant

Cooling towers – ICPE

Pedestrian comfort study – La Défense

Confort au Vent – PSG training center

Wind study – La Défense

Fine particle capture in a metro station

Sharaan by Jean Nouvel resort

Air coolers – Critical study – Heat wave

Fine dust measurements

Balenciaga – Wind potential